Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: Therefore Izurri is now bound Kq the lo wer court's decision that It lacked standing to object and for this reason. the writ certiorar should he dismissed Even Izumi had properly the issue for review the unoo of appeals' determination that Izumi lacked standing was sound and should not be absent abuse of discretion. See NAACP A New York, 413 U.S. 345 365. -66 {1973) (intervention 1snt be timely: iower court's decision regarding timeliness ts subject to reversal only for abuse of discretion} The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in refusing to accord Izumi standing intervene object vacatur both because of Izumi attenuated the judgments and because of Izumi's delay 11 seeking protect its alleged interest The only interest in these iudgments asserted by Izumi is that it ts the ind ...
(.png)
